« Rewarding Loyalty | Main | Tax Reform II: Ready to Lose Your Health Insurance? »

Comments

eRobin

Join my club of the confused observers of the Norquistas. This idea to privatize the public sector - one when it's profitable, like in the areas of education and infrastructure management - is one of Norquists pet themes. Listen to or read his interview on Terry Gross' show. You won't be any better informed about the idea, but you can see how fervently Norquist pushes it. That interview got a lot of attention because Norquist compared the Estate Tax to the Holocaust, but I was more interested in this :

GROSS: What would happen in your plan to public schools, the police, firefighters, highways and homeland security?

Mr. NORQUIST: Certainly. I would like to see--and the goal of the center right coalition in America today is to drop the cost of government, federal, state and local together, in half, with several measures: one, total spending as a percentage of the economy. Right now, government spending is about 30, 32 percent of the economy. I want to take that down to 16 percent of the economy over 25 years. How do you do that? You mentioned roads. Roads built by the federal government cost 30 percent more than they have to because there is a racist law which was passed in the 1930s called the Davis-Bacon Act. It was designed--and the people on the floor of the House and Senate who passed it said clearly it was designed to keep black people out of the construction industry because blacks were moving up from the South working on highways, and they only wanted white guys to have those jobs. This Davis-Bacon Act, which requires, quote, unquote, "prevailing wages," meaning union wages, to be paid, means that you can't have different companies bidding, and it bids up the cost of building highways by about one-third.

GROSS: So what you're saying is by not paying a union wage, by lowering the wages of those workers, we could cut more taxes.

Mr. NORQUIST: Well, you had said what services...

GROSS: Right.

Mr. NORQUIST: ...do you have to get rid of to drop the cost of government significantly.

GROSS: Right.

Mr. NORQUIST: And my argument is you don't have to drop service. I'm not talking about less roads. I want more roads, not less roads.

GROSS: But you're talking about lower wages. Am I reading you wrong? Just tell me, am I reading you wrong, that--paying workers less...

Mr. NORQUIST: Well, not necessarily lower wages...

GROSS: Yeah.

Mr. NORQUIST: ...because over the course of a year, you're talking about people having full-time jobs for the whole year. What you do with the Davis-Bacon Act is you spike people's income for a short period, and then they go unemployed for a longer period. So I would argue that you're talking about having a wealthier and more successful set of employees in non-union construction, which is why most construction people are non-union by choice. And so the Davis-Bacon Act is an example of a law. When you compare government education and independent education in this country, independent education costs about half as much and provides a better education than government education, on average.

Gross tried her best , but there he didn't answer the question. He did give us lots of fantasy-grade speculation and race baiting - par for Norquist's course. The question I need answered is what is their long term vision of privatization? How will they get corps to plug that holes that gov't plugs naturally - like the ones you mentioned above. They never get close to explaining any of that because I think the answer is close to what people had in Dickens' England. Except with churches playing an established role in the process.

Have you read Paperwight's look at the medical insurance deduction? I think he's saying what the Norquistas won't.

Kathy

It's on my 'to read' list for tomorrow. Thanks for the heads up. I've also got to get up to speed on Norquist. He hasn't been on my radar screen and I think that's an oversight.

eRobin

He - or his ideas - are running the show. Be sure to read the WaPo profile of him. It's here and includes this bit of info:


His manner is charming, though bitterness creeps into his voice when he talks about classmates at Harvard, where he attended college ('78) and business school ('81). As a Republican, Norquist felt isolated among the students, whom he calls "Bolsheviks." At a reunion in the early 1990s, he said, he told a classmate: "For 40 years we fought a two-front war against the Soviet Union and state-ism. Now we can turn all our time and energy to crushing you. With the Soviet Union, it was just business. With you, it's personal."

He's charming like a serial killer with anger issues is charming.

Disinfopedia and Wikipedia are other good sources and the whole Fresh Air transcript. He's a dangerous man.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Blog powered by Typepad

Search this Site with Google

Traffic